<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How should the tool links work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Turner</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I want to thank everyone for their thoughts and input! I&#039;m still working out in my head how it should all work, but I&#039;m certainly taking everyone&#039;s opinions to mind.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank everyone for their thoughts and input! I&#8217;m still working out in my head how it should all work, but I&#8217;m certainly taking everyone&#8217;s opinions to mind.</p>

<p>Thanks again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SÃ©rgio Nunes</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>SÃ©rgio Nunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My suggestion - have a local page for each tool with a short description (+ photo) of the tool and then keep the comments available. It serve two goals: (1) easily find which artists use a given tool, (2) promote discussion about each tool.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, it would be a good way to monetize this site. :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your work on this great site.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My suggestion - have a local page for each tool with a short description (+ photo) of the tool and then keep the comments available. It serve two goals: (1) easily find which artists use a given tool, (2) promote discussion about each tool.</p>

<p>Also, it would be a good way to monetize this site. :)</p>

<p>Thanks for your work on this great site.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabi campanario</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>gabi campanario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-24</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;first of all, congrats on the site Bill, a terrific idea. as far as your question goes I&#039;d do links to specific brand products and avoid generic links like &quot;canvasses&quot;, &quot;oil&quot;, &quot;pastels&quot; and so forth. For that maybe it&#039;d be good to do a &quot;glossary&quot; post or page so folks can look up the definition if they need to. Hope that helps!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first of all, congrats on the site Bill, a terrific idea. as far as your question goes I&#8217;d do links to specific brand products and avoid generic links like &#8220;canvasses&#8221;, &#8220;oil&#8221;, &#8220;pastels&#8221; and so forth. For that maybe it&#8217;d be good to do a &#8220;glossary&#8221; post or page so folks can look up the definition if they need to. Hope that helps!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt c</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>matt c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-21</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In the article, link to the page to buy it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then, tag the article with tool name.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the article, link to the page to buy it. </p>

<p>Then, tag the article with tool name.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gillt</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>gillt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great idea for a blog, especially for someone starting out. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Option 2 works best for me. There&#039;s an app. for linking multiple sites to one link, that way readers could shop around. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really like the word cloud in the &quot;Featured Tools&quot; bar.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea for a blog, especially for someone starting out. </p>

<p>Option 2 works best for me. There&#8217;s an app. for linking multiple sites to one link, that way readers could shop around. </p>

<p>I really like the word cloud in the &#8220;Featured Tools&#8221; bar.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a tough call between 2 and 3.  I like the clean text with the links at the end.  #3 then.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a tough call between 2 and 3.  I like the clean text with the links at the end.  #3 then.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabrielle</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabrielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love your new blog.  Great idea and perfect for the art supply addict in us all.  I&#039;d have to agree with Nina and go with #3.  I find the highlighted &amp; underlined body copy a little distracting and since the links are at the end of each post you probably don&#039;t need them twice.  Also, be careful about which outside links you use.  Places like DickBlick etc. are constantly changing their links.  Might lead to frustration for you a few months down the line.  Maybe use search engine links instead?  Thanks for the great work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your new blog.  Great idea and perfect for the art supply addict in us all.  I&#8217;d have to agree with Nina and go with #3.  I find the highlighted &amp; underlined body copy a little distracting and since the links are at the end of each post you probably don&#8217;t need them twice.  Also, be careful about which outside links you use.  Places like DickBlick etc. are constantly changing their links.  Might lead to frustration for you a few months down the line.  Maybe use search engine links instead?  Thanks for the great work.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nina</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would be fine with any of the options, but I think I like #3 best. A clean text, where the emphasis is on the contents, and then if I wonder what a tool is, I check the links below. On the other hand, links in the text are very easily accessible... oh, so many choices... ;)
In any case, itÂ´s good to be able to get some kind of image of the tools youÂ´re curious about, so links to the product instead of to the archives would be great.
Any way you choose to do it, please keep up the good work, the interviews are super interesting!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be fine with any of the options, but I think I like #3 best. A clean text, where the emphasis is on the contents, and then if I wonder what a tool is, I check the links below. On the other hand, links in the text are very easily accessible&#8230; oh, so many choices&#8230; ;)
In any case, itÂ´s good to be able to get some kind of image of the tools youÂ´re curious about, so links to the product instead of to the archives would be great.
Any way you choose to do it, please keep up the good work, the interviews are super interesting!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Painter ofblue</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Painter ofblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;2 definitely!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 definitely!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/2009/03/how-should-the-tool-links-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetoolsartistsuse.com/?p=180#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. #2 is the way to go.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. #2 is the way to go.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
